Skip to content
Hosted in Europe. Your test data is stored in the European Union.Hosted and stored in EuropeLearn more

A one-sentence verdict, in euros.

The report opens with the conclusion and its range. The gain is corrected for the winner’s curse before being converted into euros of revenue and margin, and the checks are listed alongside for anyone who wants to verify.

Free shipping progress bar
Conclusive. Proven gain

Result. Showing progress toward free shipping: revenue per visitor +6.0% measured, +4.9% expected once corrected for the winner’s curse. The effect on margin isn’t established yet: +3.0% measured, range from -0.7% to +6.7%.

Why. More orders reach the threshold: customers add an item rather than pay for shipping.

Next. Expected revenue: +€125,700 per month after correcting for the winner’s curse. Then test a €50 threshold, measured on margin.

Expected revenue / month+€125,700range +€41,600 to +€209,800
Boundary crossed at checkpointday 18 · z = 3.1
0:40 · no sound, looping
Read the transcript

Can you trust this result? The verdict at the top of the report, with everything you need to check it alongside.

The report starts with the conclusion. “Free shipping progress bar”: one sentence, the test’s status, then each metric with its 95% range.

The checks sit next to the verdict. 9 checks, each with its value: sample, traffic split, guardrails, matched orders. The report also lists what isn’t known yet.

The gap between segments isn’t proven. Mobile +9.5%, Desktop +2.7%: after Holm’s correction for 2 comparisons, the range of the gap includes zero. The variant rolls out to everyone.

Each test outcome has its own screen. 6 outcomes, from a clear win to a guardrail stop, each with its own title and dot color.

The “Free shipping progress bar” report is in the demo, no sign-up needed.

The full report, as it appears.

Report for the “Free shipping progress bar” test on the demo store. Differences, 95% ranges, amounts, and checks are computed by the engine from the test’s raw data.

Free shipping progress bar

Cart · all devices · launched Oct 23 by Camille · day 18

Conclusive.

Result. Showing progress toward free shipping: revenue per visitor +6.0% measured, +4.9% expected once corrected for the winner’s curse. The effect on margin isn’t established yet: +3.0% measured, range from -0.7% to +6.7%.

Why. More orders reach the threshold: customers add an item rather than pay for shipping.

Next. Expected revenue: +€125,700 per month after correcting for the winner’s curse. Then test a €50 threshold, measured on margin.

Metrics
MetricOriginalVariantDifference95% range
Revenue per visitorprimaryOriginal €24.58 · Variant €26.06€24.58€26.06+6.0%
+2.2% to +10.0%
Margin per visitorafter product costs, discounts, and shippingOriginal €10.03 · Variant €10.33€10.03€10.33+3.0%
-0.7% to +6.7%
Conversion rateOriginal 20.0% · Variant 20.8%20.0%20.8%+3.9%
+0.7% to +7.2%
Average order valueOriginal €122.90 · Variant €125.40€122.90€125.40+2.0%
0.0% to +4.1%
Orders with free shippingexplains the gap between revenue and marginOriginal 41.0% · Variant 57.0%41.0%57.0%+16 pointsExpected effect of the variant
Guardrails
GuardrailOriginalVariantDifference95% range
Return rateprovisional, 30-day value on Dec 9Original 1.6% · Variant 1.7%1.6%1.7%+2.6%
Within limit, limit +25.0%
Mobile speed (LCP)Original 2.41 s · Variant 2.42 s2.41 s2.42 s+0.4%
Within limit, limit +4.0%
JavaScript errorsshare of visitors with an error · limit +25%Original 0.12% · Variant 0.12%0.12%0.12%+0.2%
Watch
Amounts
Expected revenue / month+€125,700+€41,600 to +€209,800
Expected margin / month+€27,700-€5,400 to +€60,900
Free shipping-€23,800per month, already deducted from margin
Checks
Planned sample size104%
A/B split50.0 / 50.0
Sample ratio mismatch (SRM) testp = 0.81
Saw both versions0.3%
Guardrails breachednone
Boundary crossed at checkpointday 18 · z = 3.1
Orders reconciled98.6%
Known costs (margin)96.7%
Winner’s cursecorrected, +4.9%

What the report does for you.

Three checks run before any figure is shown.

The reported gain is corrected before it is promised.

On average, a test’s winner overstates its effect: it was picked partly because chance favored it. Probant pulls the measured difference toward what your 48 past tests make plausible. Here, +6.0% measured becomes +4.9% reported, and that figure is the one converted into euros.

  • Expected revenue: +€125,700 per month, range +€41,600 to +€209,800
  • Expected margin: +€27,700 per month
  • Free shipping cost: -€23,800 per month, already deducted from the margin
Winner’s curseprior drawn from 48 completed tests
Past test effects: +1.7% on average Measured: +6.0% Reported: +4.9%
Amounts, after correction
Expected revenue / month+€125,700+€41,600 to +€209,800
Expected margin / month+€27,700-€5,400 to +€60,900
Free shipping-€23,800per month, already deducted from margin

Checks are listed next to the verdict.

Sample reached, traffic split, visitors seen in both versions, guardrails, decisive checkpoint, reconciled orders: 9 checks, each with its value. What the test cannot tell yet is written down too.

Checksnext to the verdict
Planned sample size104%
A/B split50.0 / 50.0
Sample ratio mismatch (SRM) testp = 0.81
Saw both versions0.3%
Guardrails breachednone
Boundary crossed at checkpointday 18 · z = 3.1
Orders reconciled98.6%
Known costs (margin)96.7%
Winner’s cursecorrected, +4.9%
What we don’t know yet
  • “Return rate”: 30-day value, complete on Dec 9, 2026 at the earliest if the test stopped today.

Segments don’t create false patterns.

Slicing a result by device or by new vs. returning visitors will eventually show a “better” segment. Probant tests the difference between segments and corrects for multiple comparisons with the Holm method before saying whether it is real. Here, it is not, so the variant rolls out to everyone.

Segments · Revenue per visitor95% ranges
Mobile+9.5%+4.4% to +15.0%
Desktop+2.7%-3.1% to +8.7%
New+7.4%+2.6% to +12.5%
Returning+4.4%-1.8% to +11.1%
Difference between segmentsNot shownDevice and new vs. returning compared, Holm correction.

A multivariate test is read section by section.

On “Orbe product page: title, photo, and badge” (Title, Photo, Badge: 12 combinations), each section is compared with its original across all traffic, interactions between sections are measured, and the 4 comparisons reported in the plan are corrected with the Holm method. Each combination can still be read as a variant.

  • Title “Benefit”: +3.0% vs. the original (-2.4% to +8.7%), not conclusive after correction
  • Title “Short”: -4.1% vs. the original (-9.2% to +1.3%), not conclusive after correction
  • Photo “In a room”: +11% vs. the original (+6.0% to +16%), conclusive after correction
  • Badge “Made in France”: +6.6% vs. the original (+2.0% to +11%), conclusive after correction
  • Recommendation: Combination D · In a room + Made in France
  • Interactions weren’t declared in the plan: they’re shown for reference and don’t decide anything. The recommendation follows the main effects, section by section.

Every test outcome has its own screen.

Winner, loser, no detectable effect, too early, sample ratio mismatch, stopped by a guardrail: 6 situations, 6 different readings. The examples come from the demo store.

  • Conclusive. Proven gain

    The variant wins, with its range.

    Free shipping progress barCart · Revenue per visitor

    Showing progress toward free shipping: revenue per visitor +6.0% measured, +4.9% expected once corrected for the winner’s curse. The effect on margin isn’t established yet: +3.0% measured, range from -0.7% to +6.7%.

    Measured difference
    +6.0%
    Corrected expected revenue
    +€125,700 / month
  • Conclusive. Proven loss

    The variant loses: the whole range is below zero.

    Strikethrough prices in redProduct page · Revenue per visitor

    More clicks, but smaller orders. Difference -3.4%, range -6.0% to -0.7%.

    Measured difference
    -3.4%
    Ended on
    Aug 28

    Completed test from the library

  • No detectable effect.

    B makes no measurable difference to revenue per visitor.

    Customer reviews at the top of the pageProduct page · Revenue per visitor

    After 21 days and 64,100 visitors, the difference is -0.4%, range -4.0% to +3.3%. Narrowing it to ±2% would take 50 days more.

    Measured difference
    -0.4%
    For ±2%
    71 days in total
  • Not conclusive yet…

    Too early to conclude. Next checkpoint in 4 days.

    Simplified mobile menuNavigation · Revenue per visitor

    Estimated difference +1.9%, range -3.7% to +7.8%. At the day 9 checkpoint, z = 0.6, far from the boundary of 2.45.

    Progress
    day 9 of 13
    Next checkpoint
    day 13, boundary 2.00
  • Sample ratio mismatch.

    Results hidden: B is getting fewer visitors than planned.

    One-page checkoutCheckout · Conversion

    B received 9,346 visitors versus 10,454 for A, which is 47.2% instead of 50% (χ² = 62.0). The gap comes from Safari iOS, where B is missing 1,108 visitors.

    Share of B
    47.2%
    Missing visitors
    1,108
  • Stopped by a guardrail.

    B pushes the return rate from 1.6% to 2.9% of orders.

    “You may also like” recommendationsProduct page · Revenue per visitor

    Relative increase of +78%, always-valid range +25% to +130%, beyond the +25% tolerance set in the test plan. Switched back to the original on Nov 10 at 05:12.

    Return rate
    1.6% → 2.9%
    Test plan tolerance
    +25%

In detail.

Summary
Result, Why, Next: three sentences, in plain language, without jargon.
Ranges
95% on every metric and every guardrail, on the relative difference between the variant and the original.
Amounts
Revenue and margin per month, rounded to the nearest hundred euros: a gain estimated to the euro would suggest a precision it doesn’t have.
Winner’s curse
Bayesian shrinkage toward the average effect of your completed tests, applied before any conversion into euros.
Checks
Planned sample size, A/B split, Sample ratio mismatch (SRM) test, Saw both versions, Guardrails breached, Boundary crossed at checkpoint, Orders reconciled, Known costs (margin), Winner’s curse.
Segments
Mobile, Desktop, New, Returning, with a heterogeneity test corrected by Holm.
Verdicts
Winner, loser, no notable effect, not settled yet, or blocked by a sample ratio mismatch or a guardrail.

Frequently asked questions.

Why is the reported gain smaller than the measured difference?

Because a winner is picked partly thanks to chance. Correcting before reporting avoids promising a figure that won’t materialize: +6.0% measured, +4.9% reported on the demo store.

What does “No detectable effect” mean?

That the range includes zero at the end of the test. It is not “no effect”: an effect too small for this traffic is still possible. The report says how many more days it would take to decide, and what that would cost.

Why are some results hidden?

When the split of visitors between A and B is off, the two groups are no longer comparable: any difference would mix the variant’s effect with that of a malfunction. Results stay hidden until the cause is diagnosed.

Next: Session recordings and click maps

See this feature in the demo, on the screen this page describes, or move on to the next one.

  • Open demo, no sign-up
  • Free to start, no overage charges
  • Database and compute in Amsterdam, with Scaleway